Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Shintaro Imai vs Charles Broom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Imai vs Broom analysis and find out who is favored!
Shintaro Imai vs Charles Broom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Imai has won 48.82% of points on his second serve, while Broom has won 52.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Imai, in recent form, has won 50.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broom has won 56.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.54% and 31.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Imai has saved 58.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broom has saved 64.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Imai has won 58.62% of matches played (W/L 17/ 12), with Broom winning 61.25% (W/L 49/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Imai has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 80% (W/L 4/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2). Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Imai has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 12/ 9), where as Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Imai has played against opponents with an average rank of 323.38 while Broom has played against players with an average rank of 220.66.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Imai has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broom has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Imai has converted 47.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broom has converted 36.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Imai 0 - 0 Broom
570
Rank
290
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
313
Rank
313
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
63% (282-164)
Career Total W/L
63% (205-118)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
63% (20-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$36,000
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Shintaro Imai | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 63% (20/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (29/21) | 59% (46/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (251/240) | 53% (392/354) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 68% (13/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 115 | 198 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 81 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:37 | 1:54:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 288 | 203.78 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (988/1574) | 64% (1497/2329) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (700/988) | 70% (1054/1497) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (291/586) | 52% (436/832) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (54/117) | 37% (99/268) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (579/1524) | 41% (1030/2519) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 71% (15/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (12/20) | 63% (20/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 57% (8/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 83% (18/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 17% (18/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 36% (14/5) |
Shintaro Imai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Shintaro Imai
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Shintaro Imai
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
85
|
6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Daniel Little
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Shintaro Imai
80%
(
73 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
78 of
120)
3
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
120)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sora Fukuda
Player
Shintaro Imai
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Leo Vithoontien
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Kokoro Isomura
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Shintaro Imai
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Makoto Ochi
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Charles Broom
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Henry Searle
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Robert Strombachs
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alexis Canter
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alex Knaff
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Finn Bass
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
George Houghton
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Imai Vs Broom Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
